Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Ahmad v. Bank of America NA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00808
Plaintiff: Parveen Ahmad
Defendant: Bank of America NA, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, LaSalle Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foland v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00468
Plaintiff: Kevin Foland
Defendant: Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Right Path Servicing, U.S. Bank, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01538
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Medford LLC v. Malcolm & Cisneros, et al
as 1:2020cv01992
Plaintiff: Medford LLC
Defendant: U.S. Bank, N.A. and Malcolm & Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441
Umpqua Bank v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 3:2020cv00974
Defendant: U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Umpqua Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01700
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01510
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01071
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00957
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00822
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?