Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Doe v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Acting Director Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Trujillo Diaz v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 1:2021cv00733
Plaintiff:
Maribel Trujillo Diaz
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01480
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00223
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NetJets Aviation, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture et al
as 2:2020cv04464
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
NetJets Aviation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Solis-Martinez v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 1:2020cv01175
Defendant:
Attorney General William P. Barr, Rebecca Adducci, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Cristhian Jared Solis-Martinez
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00839
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00665
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00265
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
