Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cook v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2024cv02254
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Primus v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron) et al
as 5:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Sharyll Primus
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron), Tameka Brooks, Brad Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Medved v. U.S. Attorney, et al
as 17-3665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. MEDVED
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY, N.D. Ohio and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medved v. U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
John Edward Medved
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Loper v. FBI-Cleveland Field Office et al
as 1:2017cv01000
Plaintiff:
Latasha Loper
Defendant:
FBI-Cleveland Field Office, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Teller v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2016cv01417
Plaintiff:
Susan Rebecca Teller
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith-Utley v. City of Toledo et al
as 3:2016cv00977
Plaintiff:
Darnell A. Smith-Utley
Defendant:
City of Toledo, George Kral, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2013cv02074
Plaintiff:
James E. Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, N.D. Ohio and City of Cleveland, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
McAlpine v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
William A. McAlpine
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
