Cases 1 - 10 of 1,330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-1047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Coleman v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 1:2025cv00296
Defendant:
NP Grand RE, LLC., Daniel Management Group, Inc. and U.S. Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Tristian Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 3:2025cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Federal Probation Supervisor, Connecticut Probation Office, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wheeler v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2024cv09984
Petitioner:
Damon Wheeler
Respondent:
Warden, U.S. Marshal and R. Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv13235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dudley v. U.S. Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2024cv01976
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office and U.S. Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
Eric A Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Upunder Bieber-Bonneau v. Conlin et al
as 3:2024cv02070
Defendant:
Zachary Conlin, United States of America, Joe Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan B. Upunder Bieber-Bonneau, Ryan Bonneau and Ryan Bautista-Bonneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. U.S. MARSHALS

as 1:2024cv01076
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 2:2024cv13093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
O'Connor v. U.S. Marshalls Services FOIA et al
as 1:2024cv11844
Plaintiff:
Valentina L. O'Connor
Defendant:
Detective Ellis, McCarthy, Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.