Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Angela Reading v. North Hanover Township New Jersey, et al
as 23-3092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA READING
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF NORTH HANOVER, ROBERT DUFF, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for North Hanover Township, HELEN PAYNE, in her individual capacity and others
Virgo v. U.S. Army et al
as 1:2023cv03806
Plaintiff:
Virgillio Virgo
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY and WALSON ARMY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHUKWU v. U.S. ARMY
as 1:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
OBIOMA CHUKWU
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv04128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MANUEL v. U.S. ARMY et al
as 2:2017cv05465
Plaintiff:
GARY E. MANUEL
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY, THE STATE COLORADO, THE STATE MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OBERUCH v. THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 3:2016cv06753
Plaintiff:
JOHN OBERUCH, JR.
Defendant:
THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OKEYO v. USCIS et al
as 2:2016cv00818
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L OKEYO
Defendant:
USCIS, U.S. ARMY and U.S. NAVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MACKEY v. U.S. CIVIL SERVICE + DEPT OF V. AFFAIRS et al
as 2:2011cv05136
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANCIS MACKEY
Defendant:
U.S. CIVIL SERVICE + DEPT OF V. AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF PERSONAL MANAGEMENT, SOCIAL SECURITY ADM. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
