Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Davis, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARLA DAVIS and JALEN DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, in his official and individual capacities, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Egli v. USDC District of Utah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00551
Plaintiff: Daniel David Egli
Defendant: USDC District of Utah doing business as Trina A Higgins, Karin Fojtik and U.S. Attorney General doing business as Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osorio v. Garland
as 22-9559
Petitioner: FIDEL URIBE OSORIO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Sandoval-Zamora, et al v. Garland
as 22-9523
Petitioner: IRMA ESTELA SANDOVAL-ZAMORA and GILMER ALEXANDER MORALES-SANDOVAL
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Jaime-Mireles v. Barr
as 20-9625
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner: SALVADOR JAIME-MIRELES
Barragan Piedra v. Barr
as 20-9612
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner: FRANCISCO BARRAGAN PIEDRA
Acuna-Prieto v. Barr
as 20-9559
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner: VERONICA ACUNA-PRIETO
In re: Young
as 20-1176
Respondent: JUDICIAL COUNCIL, WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General, EIGHTH CIRCUIT JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE and others
Petitioner: In re: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Young v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 19-1480
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPT. OF JUSTICE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Young v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 19-1369
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPT. OF JUSTICE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?