Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Phillips v. Davis et al
as 8:2017mc00064
Petitioner:
Thomas Phillips, III
Respondent:
Richard Davis , Hillsborough County Clerk of Courts, Comptroller of Currency and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Podrug v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 3:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
Armin Podrug
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ellis v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 6:2016cv01750
Plaintiff:
Ernest Michael Ellis, III
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., Caliber Home Loans, Inc., Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McCord et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2016cv00264
Plaintiff:
Richard J. McCord , Enoch Persad , J.M.P. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Cyprexx Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conlon v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Edward Paul Conlon
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. and Five Brothers Mortgage Company Services and Securing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Castrillon et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 6:2015cv01532
Plaintiff:
Josefa Castrillon and Alcibiades Castrillon
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A. , Opteum Financial Services, LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 8:2014cv02566
Plaintiff:
Diana Parker
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
