Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jones v. U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 7:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Jones
Defendant:
U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Charlotte Burrows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00574
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. JC Wings Enterprises, LLC
as 4:2016cv03245
Plaintiff:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Defendant:
JC Wings Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Vitran Express
as 4:2014mc02522
Petitioner:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Vitran Express
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. United Bible Fellowship Ministries, Inc.
as 4:2013cv02871
Defendant:
United Bible Fellowship Ministries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aviles v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
as 4:2011cv03838
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Aviles
Defendant:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
