Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Henderson v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
Bill Henderson and Bill Henderson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HOLLIS v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00205
Defendant:
US FOODS, INC. and U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HOLLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stapleton-Spence Packing Co v. U.S. Foodservice Inc
as 5:2013cv04722
Defendant:
U.S. Foodservice Inc
Plaintiff:
Stapleton-Spence Packing Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
U.S. Foodservice, Inc. v. Signature Classics, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv02128
Plaintiff:
U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Defendant:
Signature Classics, Inc. and Jeffrey Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. FoodService, Inc. v. Cusick et al
as 1:2010cv01101
Plaintiff:
U.S. FoodService, Inc.
Defendant:
Vicki Cusick, Jeff Cattell, Jennifer Gosselin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dining Alliance, Inc. v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
as 1:2010cv11196
Plaintiff:
Dining Alliance, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. FOODSERVICE INC v. FANELLI et al
as 3:2010cv01208
Plaintiff:
U.S. FOODSERVICE INC
Defendant:
ROBERT A FANELLI and ROBERT L EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
U.S. Foodservice, Inc. v. Euler Hermes American Credit Indemnity Company
as 2:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Defendant:
Euler Hermes American Credit Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. v. DECKER et al
as 5:2009cv05025
Plaintiff:
U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.
Defendant:
ROBERT DECKER, TONY FAULKNER, THOMAS WASILEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. v. PEERA
as 2:2009cv00196
Plaintiff:
U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN PEERA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
