Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Watson v. NAPH Care et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Andrew Houston Watson
Defendant:
NAPH Care, Montgomery County Jail, Lamarquis Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkle v. U.S. Marshal Service et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Montgomery City Jail, Mac Sim Butler Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00753
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 1:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Scott Myers
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Warden Ward, Lt. Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00626
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Thomas
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy , U.S. Marshals Service, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Bennett, III
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy , U.S. Marshals Service and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeVaughn v. U.S. Marshall Service et al
as 2:2012cv01791
Plaintiff:
Michael O DeVaughn
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall Service and Sheriff of Jefferson County Jail
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
