Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Cheeks v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 3:2023cv00939
Petitioner:
Kirk R. Cheeks
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hogue v. McGrath et al
as 3:2022cv01909
Plaintiff:
Ayo K. Hogue
Defendant:
Megan McGrath, Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad Akbar, Sr. v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 21-55771
Petitioner / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD JALAL-DEEN AKBAR, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and JENKINS, Warden
Clinton Eldridge v. Barbara von Blanckensee, et al
as 21-15616
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, Acting Chairman of the U.S. Parole Commission and BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 2:2021cv02846
Petitioner:
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar and Muhammad Jalal-Deen Akbar, Sr
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lutton v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 3:2021cv01679
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission
Plaintiff:
Rex M. Lutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael O. DeVaughn v. U.S. Parole Commission et al
as 2:2020cv09143
Respondent:
David Valentine and U.S. Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Michael O. DeVaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harun Ghaffar v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 17-55590
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARUN A. GHAFFAR, FKA Aaron C. Kelly
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and RICHARD B. IVES, Warden
Pope v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 2:2017cv00664
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and U.S. Parole Commission
Petitioner:
Kevin Donald Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Margaret Mable v. United States District Court f, et al
as 16-36080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET MABLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
