Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Tyrone Hurt v. Board of Parole, et al
as 20-2484
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tyrone Hurt
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. Parole Commission, et al and D.C. Board of Parole, et al
Tyrone Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole, et al
as 20-2079
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tyrone Hurt
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. Parole Commission, et al and D.C. Board of Parole, et al
Lambros v. U.S. Parole Commission et al
as 0:2018cv00571
Petitioner: John Gregory Lambros
Respondent: U.S. Parole Commission and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Donnie Dumas v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 16-3601
Petitioner - Appellant: Donnie Ray Dumas
Respondent - Appellee: U.S. Parole Commission
Denoyer v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv00185
Petitioner: Dale Ernest DeNoyer
Respondent: U.S. Marshal's Service, U.S. Parole Commission, U.S. Probation Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Denoyer v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv04088
Petitioner: Dale Ernest DeNoyer
Respondent: United States of America, U.S. Marshal's Service, U.S. Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Donnie Dumas v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 14-2358
Petitioner - Appellant: Donnie Ray Dumas
Respondent - Appellee: U.S. Parole Commission
Dumas v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 4:2013cv00707
Petitioner: Donnie Ray Dumas
Respondent: U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Albert L. Johnson v. U.S. Parole Commission We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3083
Petitioner - Appellant: Albert L. Johnson
Respondent - Appellee: U.S. Parole Commission
Muhammad Akbar v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 10-1741
Petitioner - Appellant: Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar
Respondent - Appellee: U.S. Parole Commission and Warden Brian Jett, FMC Rochester

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?