Cases 1 - 10 of 20
ATKINSON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSIONER et al
as 1:2022cv00253
Petitioner:
FREDERICK ATKINSON
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSIONER and WARDEN, USP BEAUMONT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nkosi v. Commissioner et al
as 1:2021cv02166
Petitioner:
Pharaoh Ojore Nkosi
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commissioner, Ms. Cuswa and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abdul-Ali v. Dyer et al
as 7:2021cv00634
Petitioner:
Rashid Abdul-Ali
Defendant:
Frank Dyer and U.S. Parole Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chandler v. U.S. Parole Commissioner
as 1:2016cv01009
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Haley v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 15-1545
Petitioner - Appellant:
Samuel E. Haley
Respondent - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Deborah Leff, New Pardon Attorney and Maria Rustin, U.S. Parole Commissioner
Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole et al
as 1:2015cv01533
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D.C. Board of Parole and U.S. Parole Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07320
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wilson v. Cherry et al
as 1:2013cv00800
Petitioner:
Marlon Andre Wilson
Respondent:
Ralph Cherry, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Parole Commissioner and others
Solana v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv03519
Defendant:
Eastern District of New York Chief Probation Officer, NYC Department of Corrections, T. Paris and others
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Solana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
