Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Steven Voneida v. John Johnson
as 22-1264
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN A. VONEIDA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN JOHNSON, U.S. Probation Officer
Hernando Vergara v. U.S. Probation Office, et al
as 22-10037
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERNANDO JAVIER VERGARA
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. PROBATION OFFICE, FRANCEAN JACKSON, SHEKEVIA C. HAWKINS and others
James Faller, III v. Acting U.S. Attorney, et al
as 21-14189
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES S. FALLER, III
Respondent / Appellee:
ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY and U.S. PROBATION OFFICE
James Faller, III v. Acting U.S. Attorney, et al
as 21-14188
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES S. FALLER, III
Respondent / Appellee:
ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY and LORI MITCHELL, U.S. Probation Office
Beeson v. Elliott et al
as 9:2021cv00143
Plaintiff:
Taylor Anthony Beeson
Defendant:
Tara J. Elliott, Troy Capser, Brandon Cray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Richardson v. Loris Police Chief
as 21-7504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis Dale Richardson and SYBIL MCNEIL
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIS POLICE CHIEF, a/k/a Gary Buley and LT. ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCMILLIAN, U.S. Probation Officer and BRIAN JOHNSON, U.S. Probation Officer
Faller v. Estes et al
as 1:2021cv00152
Petitioner:
James S. Faller, II
Respondent:
David Estes, U.S. Probation Office and Lori Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maxwell Joelson v. David Sultzbaugh
as 21-55440
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAXWELL RANGEL JOELSON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHIEF U.S. PROBATION OFFICER DAVID J. SULTZBAUGH, For the Southern District of California
Benjamin Tillman v. Officer Lawrimore
as 21-11471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN TILLMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER LAWRIMORE, U.S. Probation Officer/Investigator
Edward Dembry v. U.S. Probation Office, et al
as 21-1422
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. Probation Office and Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner / Appellant:
Edward Keith Dembry
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
