Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Scott v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
as 7:2019cv03817
Defendant:
U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nichelle Scott
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0159
Schwartz v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00316
Defendant:
U.S. Security Associates, Inc., AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC and AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC doing business as Allied Universal
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sx
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
King v. U.S. Security Associates Inc.
as 1:2016cv06600
Plaintiff:
Tammylyn King
Defendant:
U.S. Security Associates Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Bailey-Thomas et al v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03560
Plaintiff:
Erroll O. Bailey-Thomas
Defendant:
U.S. Security Associates, Inc. , U.S. Security Associates Aviation Services, Inc. , Bill Bubenjeck and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Precil v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
as 1:2015cv08893
Plaintiff:
Harold Precil
Defendant:
U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Dinchong et al v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
as 1:2014cv04879
Plaintiff:
Andre Allen, Javon Dinchong, Nortsford Pysadee and others
Defendant:
John Does #1-5 and U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Panjwani v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
as 1:2013cv08199
Plaintiff:
Karim Panjwani
Defendant:
U.S. Security Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
