Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adkins v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2015cv01113
Plaintiff:
Maggie D. Adkins
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Pena-Reyes et al v. U.S.A. Lawns, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv02855
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Pena-Reyes and Adolfo Pena-Reyes
Defendant:
U.S.A. Lawns, Inc. and Reinaldo J. Rose
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al v. Sea Star Line, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01183
Plaintiff:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Kimberly-Clark, Corp.
Defendant:
Sea Star Line, LLC , Saltchuk Resources, Inc., Totem Ocean Trailer Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015 Antitrust Litigation
Wirengard et al v. State Of Florida et al
as 8:2012cv02057
Plaintiff:
Robert Wirengard, Alfonso Antonio Gonzalez, Claude M. Logan and others
Defendant:
State Of Florida, U.S.A., Egpyt's Prosecutor General and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morse v. Credit Collections U.S.A., LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00877
Plaintiff:
William Morse
Defendant:
Credit Collections U.S.A., LLC and Marvin Wells
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HIC U.S.A., Inc. v. Elimar International, L.L.C. et al
as 8:2012mc00008
Plaintiff:
HIC U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Elimar International, L.L.C. and Robert Zukelman
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
