Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,320
U.S. Department of v. Tampa Electric Company
as 21-11681
Respondent: TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Petitioner: SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 21-11680
Respondent / Appellee: STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Petitioner / Appellant: VINODH RAGHUBIR
Vinodh Raghubir v. U.S. District Court Eastern NY, et al
as 21-11674
Respondent / Appellee: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Petitioner / Appellant: VINODH RAGHUBIR
Adeline Blemur v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-11646
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner: ADELINE BLEMUR
Muscogee (Creek) Nation, et al v. Buford Rollin, et al
as 21-11643
Defendant / Appellee: DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL PARKS, POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS, a federally recognized tribe, DAVID VELA, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HICKORY GROUND TRIBAL TOWN, GEORGE THOMPSON, Mekko, individually and as traditional representative of the lineal descendants of those buried at Hickory Ground Tribal Town in Wetumpka, Alabama, MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, a federally recognized Indian tribe
Manjinder Kumar v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-11619
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner: MANJINDER KUMAR
Younes Jerke v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-11578
Petitioner: YOUNES JAMES JERKE
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Armand Joseph v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-11597
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner: ARMAND JOSEPH
Eulalio Castanon Perez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-11584
Petitioner: EULALIO CASTANON PEREZ
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Michael Lobe v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-11512
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner: MICHAEL SAKWE LOBE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?