Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SAKATU et al v. VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED ST ATES et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Plaintiff:
MAKURIJA SAKATU and MAIPURI ARAUAN NATION
Defendant:
VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THE UNITED ST ATES, CONNAL RIVIERA ALFRED FIRST BANK, DENISE GEORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HARRIS v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
SIRRAH LEOWAY HARRIS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURU v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv03017
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURU v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00486
Defendant:
MARK S. ZEMELMAN, H.R. OF SAINT JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION COLORADO and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BETHEL v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2020cv01940
Consolidated Plaintiff:
RONALD DIXON
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., NELSON BENTON, JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
PLAINTIFF LARRY BETHEL and LARRY BETHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAJKOVIC v. REPUBLICAN GRAND OLD PARTY OF THE U.S. et al
as 1:2015cv00563
Plaintiff:
LJUBICA RAJKOVIC
Defendant:
REPUBLICAN GRAND OLD PARTY OF THE U.S., DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE U.S.A., UNESCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MELVIN v. WASHINGTON POST et al
as 1:2014cv00649
Plaintiff:
PAMELA MELVIN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST, U.S.A. TODAY, BOSTON GLOBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
HURT v. UNITED NATIONS et al
as 1:2007cv00032
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
UNITED NATIONS and U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
