Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
The Home Depot, Inc. et al v. Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union
as 1:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
The Home Depot Inc and Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
Defendant:
Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union
The Home Depot, Inc. et al v. Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union
as 1:2016mi00007
Plaintiff:
The Home Depot Inc and Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
Defendant:
Army Aviation Center Federal Credit Union
Roberts v. Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A.
as 1:2015cv04233
Plaintiff:
Sandra Roberts
Defendant:
Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Beaulieu International Group v. LA Rug, Inc.
as 1:2013mi00161
Plaintiff:
Beaulieu International Group
Defendant:
LA Rug, Inc.
Movant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores LP et al
as 1:2012cv03651
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Alexsam, Inc. v. Best Buy Stores LP et al
as 1:2012mi00176
Plaintiff:
Alexsam, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Buy Stores LP, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble Marketing Services Corp. and others
Basich v. Patenaude & Felix, APC et al
as 1:2012mi00095
Plaintiff:
Mary Basich
Defendant:
Patenaude & Felix, APC and Capital One Bank (U.S.A.), N.A.
Movant:
Total Debt Management, Inc.
Spears Roofing & Consultants Inc LLC et al v. AT&T Solution Real Yellow Pages U.S.A. Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv02073
Defendant:
AT&T Solution Real Yellow Pages U.S.A. Corporation and, Dave Hakanson, John Stankey and others
Plaintiff:
Spears Roofing & Consultants Inc LLC and Carl Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Conagra Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc., Giant Food Inc., Giant Food Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
