Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Washington et al v. U.S.D.A-R.D Rural Development
as 6:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Henry A. Washington, Jr. and Lula Mae Washington
Defendant:
U.S.D.A-R.D Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ayala-Estrada v. Popp et al
as 3:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ayala-Estrada
Defendant:
Brendan S. Popp, U.S.D.A., United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Arthur v. United States Dist of Indiana Southern Dist et al
as 1:2022cv03203
Plaintiff:
Brent Leland Arthur
Defendant:
United States Dist of Indiana Southern Dist, The US Federal Reserve Grocers Association, Perdue Ag Center Vincennes, In and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Glicenia Carmela Logan
Defendant:
James O Cox, P.K. Holmes, III, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mott v. U.S.D.A. et al
as 4:2021cv01464
Plaintiff:
Terrance Mott and Terrence Mott
Defendant:
U.S.D.A., U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, U.S. Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bunce v. Farm Service Agency
as 21-555
Defendant / Appellee:
Farm Service Agency, U.S.D.A
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy J. Bunce
CABLE v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2017cv03959
Defendant:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, ARAMARK, BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES CABLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Berkowitz v. U.S.D.A.
as 1:2015cv01956
Plaintiff:
Adrian C. Berkowitz
Defendant:
U.S.D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duckett v. U.S.D.A. Rural Housing Development
as 2:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dane Lee Duckett
Defendant:
U.S.D.A. Rural Housing Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
