Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Fernandez v. UAW-NUMMI Retiree Supplemental Health Insurance Plan
as 3:2009cv02488
Plaintiff:
Robert Fernandez
Defendant:
UAW-NUMMI Retiree Supplemental Health Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep,, et al v. James Goldstene, et al
as 08-17378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTRAL VALLEY CHRYSLER-JEEP, INC., MADERA FORD MERCURY, INC., MADERA CHEVROLET and others
Plaintiff-intervenor:
THE ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTUERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Excecutive Officer of the California Air Resources Board
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE and others
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW) and INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY
Thompson v. General Motors et al
as 4:2008cv04014
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Thompson
Defendant:
General Motors, UAW Union and Sedgwick CMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Thompson v. General Motors et al
as 3:2008cv04014
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Thompson
Defendant:
General Motors, UAW Union and Sedgwick CMS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evitt et al v. Mack Trucks, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv04830
Plaintiff:
Robert Evitt, Robert Evitt, Robert Evitt and others
Defendant:
Mack Trucks, Inc. and Mack Health, Disability and Life Benefits for UAW Employees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Local 492 v. Williams Controls, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01152
Plaintiff:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Local 492
Defendant:
Williams Controls, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
