Cases 1 - 8 of 8
UMB Bank, N.A. v. JB Forum Land, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
JB Forum Land, LLC, AT Forum Louisville KY II, LLC, First Guaranty Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Berry v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2021cv02308
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Berry
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., UMB Bank, N.A. and Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
UMB Bank, N.A. v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC
as 1:2021cv02225
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Middletown Professional Park Office Condominiums Council of Co-Owners, Inc. v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00793
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Revenue, Division of Collections, Service Financial Company, Unknown Heirs of Jackie W. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Middletown Professional Park Office Condominiums Council of Co-Owners, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
David Tullis v. UMB Bank, N.A., et al
as 12-3032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID H. TULLIS and MICHAEL S. MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
UMB BANK, N.A., Employee Benefits Division and JOHN DOE, 1 - 10
David Tullis, et al v. UMB Bank, N.A., et al
as 09-4370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID H. TULLIS and MICHAEL S. MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
UMB BANK, N.A., Employee Benefits Division and JOHN DOE, 1 - 10
Tullis, et al v. UMB Bank
as 06-4632
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
DAVID H. TULLIS and MICHAEL S. MACK
Amicus Curiae:
SECRETARY OF LABOR, Elaine L. Chaop
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
UMB BANK, N.A., Employees Benefits Division
Tullis, et al v. UMB Bank
as 06-4633
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
DAVID H. TULLIS and MICHAEL S. MACK
Amicus Curiae:
SECRETARY OF LABOR
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
UMB BANK, N.A., Employees Benefits Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
