Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv40121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Mysliewic v. UKG, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv40083
Plaintiff:
Catherine Mysliewic
Defendant:
UKG, Inc. and UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ward v. UKG, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv40084
Plaintiff:
Tania Ward
Defendant:
UKG, Inc., UMass Memorial Health Care, Inc. and UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Prouty v. Thippanna, et al
as 21-1724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREN PROUTY
Defendant / Appellee:
RAMAKRISHNA THIPPANNA, BOGDAN NEDELESCU and DOUGLAS PARKER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Carolyn Parker, APRN
Defendant:
IDANIS BERRIOS MORALES, JOHNNY S. SALAMEH, UMASS MEMORIAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC. and others
Interested Party:
DONNA MCELROY-ROUTHIER, JOANNE BRUELL, ASHLEY THOMPSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
