Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Attebury et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05014
Plaintiff: Ervel Attebury and Lutrecia Attebury
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Attebury et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv05012
Plaintiff: Ervel Attebury and Lutrecia Attebury
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Redco Corporation, Velan Valve Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff: Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Cheek v. Admiral Valve, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv06666
Plaintiff: Sidney Cheek
Defendant: Admiral Valve, LLC, Air Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cheek v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv06630
Plaintiff: Sidney Cheek
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Josephine Banks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv06892
Plaintiff: Josephine Banks, Jamie Banks, Nuevoe Strain and others
Defendant: 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Kranz et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00588
Defendant: Cameron International Corporation, Elliott Company, FMC Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Kranz and Lucinda Kranz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Nikolaus J. Marcher et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff: Nikolaus J. Marcher and Lynne Marcher
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., 3M Company aka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AES Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benito C. Valdez, Jr. et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv08863
Plaintiff: Benito C. Valdez, Jr. and Georgia Valdez
Petitioner: Electrolux Home Products, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Copes-Vulcan, Inc.
Defendant: CBS Corporation, Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?