Cases 1 - 10 of 1,911
Texas Tobacco Barn v. HHS
as 25-60200
Petitioner:
Texas Tobacco Barn, L.L.C.
Respondent:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food & Drug Administration and others
Briggs v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
as 25-2414
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRIGGS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and SCOTT GARRETT, Account Manager
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto, et al. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
as 25-2358
Plaintiff:
COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES IN EAST PALO ALTO, SOCIAL JUSTICE COLLABORATIVE, AMICA CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and OFFICE OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 4:2025cv01648
Plaintiff:
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mary Talley Bowden and Ally Totah
Defendant:
Food and Drug Administration, Martin A. Makary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al v. National Institutes of Health, et al
as 25-1343
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DANA NESSEL, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant:
JAY BHATTACHARYA, M.D., Ph.D. in their official capacity as Director of the National Institutes of Health, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., in their official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Interested Party:
CODY R. HART, DERRILL J. FUSSELL, MASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY COUNCIL, INC. and others
Association of American Medical Colleges, et al v. National Institutes of Health, et al
as 25-1344
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES OF PHARMACY, ASSOCIATION FOR SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS OF PUBLIC HEALTH and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, JAY BHATTACHARYA, M.D., Ph.D. in their official capacity as Director of the National Institutes of Health, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY COUNCIL, INC., CITY OF BOSTON, MA, CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH and others
Association of American Universities, et al v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al
as 25-1345
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., in their official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY COUNCIL, INC., CITY OF BOSTON, MA, CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH and others
Mills Peninsula Health Services, et al v. Robert Kennedy, Jr.
as 25-5107
Plaintiff:
Mills Peninsula Health Services, California Pacific Medical Center Davies Campus Hospital, California Pacific Medical Center - Mission Bernal, formerly known as St. Luke's Hospital and others
Defendant:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Albina Head Start, Inc. v. HHS, et al
as 25-5106
Plaintiff:
Albina Head Start, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, (DHHS) and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of DHHS, in his official capacity
John Kodenkandeth v. UPMC Health Plan Inc, et al
as 25-1513
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KODENKANDETH
Defendant:
UPMC HEALTH PLAN INC, DBA UPMC for Life, UPMC HOLDING CO INC, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
