Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 re Job Discrimination (Religion)
Schweigert v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 0:2018cv02508
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chad Schweigert
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Schweigert v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 0:2018cv02355
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chad Schweigert
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PJC Logistics, LLC v. AAA Cooper Transportation, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv02550
Plaintiff:
PJC Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
The Coca-Cola Company , Comcar Industries, Inc., Cypress Truck Lines, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
SAIA Motor Freight Line, LLC and Ryder System, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
PJC Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv02243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kleitman v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Kleitman
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Broadspire Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
