Cases 1 - 10 of 12,481
DeWilde v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives Director, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Jake Stanley DeWilde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Manuel-Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-9526
Petitioner:
CARLOS MANUEL-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Teouri v. Garland
as 24-1035
Petitioner:
SALAMOUDINE TEOURI, ABIBATOU BOURAIMA, BOUCHARA TEOURI and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Noor v. Garland
as 24-1027
Petitioner:
GOLAM MOHIUDDIN NOOR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villa-Lojano v. Garland
as 24-1023
Petitioner:
JAIME ROLANDO VILLA-LOJANO, MARIA JESSENIA CUJI-LUCERO, ANGELES JHAYME VILLA-CUJI and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maita-Tenemaza v. Garland
as 24-1020
Petitioner:
EDWIN ANTONIO MAITA-TENEMAZA, KIMBERLY ALEXANDRA MAITA-MOROCHO and CARMEN CLAUDINA MOROCHO-CALI
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendoza Delgado v. Garland
as 24-998
Petitioner:
ELMER MENDOZA DELGADO, JHENY CECILIA GUAMAN AGUAYZA, ABRAHAN EDUARDO MENDOZA GUAMAN and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Roman-Huaman v. Garland
as 24-993
Petitioner:
GILBER ROMAN-HUAMAN, ELISABETH QUISPE-CCAMA and EDRICK ROMAN QUISPE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos, et al v. Garland
as 24-9524
Petitioner:
MODESTA RAMOS RAMOS, A.M.R.R. and J.A.R.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
