Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Ignite International, LTD. v. Vidal et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
IGNITE INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
Defendant:
Kathi Vidal and The United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Reid v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
as 1:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Mark D Reid
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Perry v. PTO
as 23-1812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. PERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, WENDY GARBER, Director Patent Technology Center, DARNELL JAYNE, Director and others
Baldwin Risk Partners, LLC v. Vidal et al
as 8:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Baldwin Risk Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Director of USPTO Kathi Vidal, The United States Patent and Trademark Office and Kathi Vidal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0044 Trademark Infringement
ImmunoGen, Inc. v. Vidal
as 23-1762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IMMUNOGEN, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Bhagat v. PTO
as 23-1545
Plaintiff / Appellant:
URVASHI BHAGAT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Srinivasan v. NCH Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
N A Mahalakshmi Srinivasan
Defendant:
NCH Corporation and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Apple Inc. v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office Director, The United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Califorrniaa v. Vidal
as 22-1640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EURICA CALIFORRNIAA
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Snap Inc. v. Drew Hirshfeld et al
as 2:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Snap Inc.
Defendant:
DREW HIRSHFELD, in his capacity as Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office,, THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,, Drew Hirshfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
