Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HARRIS v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE et al
as 1:2023cv20449
Plaintiff:
RONRAY HARRIS
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE RUTGERS, MONICA TSAKIRIS, DR. RAYMOND MALTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
DEFAZIO v. DOWNING et al
as 2:2023cv03307
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEFAZIO, BETTY DOWNING, MARCELINO ARCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
DURMER v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE (RUTGERS) et al
as 2:2020cv00271
Defendant:
MD SUMALATHA MANNAVA, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE (RUTGERS) and N.J. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
JOEL E. DURMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVIS v. HICKS et al
as 1:2019cv21711
Defendant:
DR. SANTANGELLO, VICTORIA D'AMICO, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Plaintiff:
CARL L. REAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSH v. CAMPOS et al
as 3:2019cv15320
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, IHOUMA NWACHUKWA, NICOLAUS KUEHN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK MARSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lasane v. Antonio Campos, et al
as 19-1574
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY, DAVID HOFFMAN, SAMUEL LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LASANE
LASANE v. CAMPOS et al
as 3:2017cv06316
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LASANE
Defendant:
ANTONIO CAMPOS, TIMOTHY MAINES, DAVID HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALI v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2017cv01285
Plaintiff:
AL-WAHID ALI
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, MONICA TSAKIRIS, WILLIE BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAGNINA v. LANIGANI et al
as 1:2016cv07253
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAGNINA
Defendant:
GARY LANIGANI, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE RUTGERS, RALPH WOODWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
