Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Bryant v. US Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 4:2024cv01064
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs and Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs
Plaintiff:
Phillip H Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
v. McDonough et al.
as 5:2024cv02106
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs and Mr Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 0557 Administrative Procedure Act
HUTTON v. LARSEN et al
as 5:2024cv00685
Defendant:
GENIE WINN, JERRY BOWEN, LYNDA LOVELAND and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HUTTON v. LARSEN et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Defendant:
BILL ORR, JERRY BOWEN, MIKE MAZE and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Mannon v. US Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 2:2024cv11635
Defendant:
US Department of Veteran Affairs and Veterans Health Administration
Plaintiff:
Steven Mannon
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jones v. US Department of Veterans Affairs
as 4:2024cv04115
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Brad Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hutton v. US Department of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 5:2024cv00349
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Hutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUTTON v. US DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES and US DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
