Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Sandra Queen Noble v. The Stolen USA et al
as 2:2011cv10575
Plaintiff:
Sandra Queen Noble
Defendant:
Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Tika Smith, The Stolen USA and others
Sandra Noble v. The Stolen USA, et al
as 11-57010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA QUEEN NOBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STOLEN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary and others
Robert Theede v. USA, et al
as 11-17427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. THEEDE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, MID-AMERICA PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER and others
Sandra Queen Noble v. The Stolen USA et al
as 2:2011cv08444
Plaintiff:
Sandra Queen Noble
Defendant:
Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Tika Smith, The Stolen USA and others
Patricia Haro, et al v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 11-16606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PATRICIA HARO, JOHN G. BALENTINE, JACK MCNUTT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of US Department of Health and Human Services
Storman v. US Department of Health & Human Services, et al
as 2:2007cv02113
Plaintiff:
Michael David Storman
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services and CA Department of Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic v. Paulson et al
as 8:2007cv00905
Plaintiff:
Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic, Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic and Whitaker Wellness Institute Medical Clinic
Defendant:
Henry M Paulson, U S Department of the Treasury, Michael O Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Beck et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2007cv05136
Plaintiff:
Karen Beck, Karen Beck, Tawny Johnson , Estate of and others
Defendant:
United States of America and US Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
