Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Angelina Emergency Medicine v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield
as 24-10306
Plaintiff:
Angelina Emergency Medicine Associates PA, Atascosa Emergency Medicine Associates PA, Athens Emergency Medicine Associates PA and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, USAble Mutual Insurance Company, doing business as Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health, doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and others
Zaldivar v. Uniti Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv06915
Plaintiff:
Jessica Zaldivar
Defendant:
Uniti Group, Inc. and Usable Mutual Insurance Company doing business as BlueAdvantage Administrators of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
de Moor et al v. Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 4:2023cv00968
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., Hawaii Medical Services Corporation doing business as Hawaii Medical Services Association also known as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Hawaii, Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. formerly known as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
MD Carrie de Moor and Code 3 Emergency Physicians, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES, LLC v. USABLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv04060
Plaintiff:
ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES, LLC doing business as GENESIS DIAGNOSTICS
Defendant:
USABLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY doing business as ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD, LIFE AND SPECIALTY VENTURES, LLC, ABC COMPANIES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
James v. USAble Life et al
as 4:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Kimberlee James
Defendant:
USAble Life and USAble Mutual Insurance Company doing business as Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company, et al
as 22-55631
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABC SERVICES GROUP, INC., in its capacity as assignee for the benefit of creditors for Morningside Recovery, LLC,
Defendant / Appellee:
AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM, INC., DBA Anthem Health, Inc. and others
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
