Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on denials of applications for naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01875
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02975
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv24186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Rudolph Carneiro, et al v. USCIS District Director, et al
as 20-13298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDOLPH CARNEIRO and TATIANA DINIZ-PEREIRA
Defendant / Appellee:
USCIS DISTRICT DIRECTOR SOUTHEAST REGION, Official capacity, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Official capacity, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Official capacity and others
Anastasiia Ermuraki, et al v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, et al
as 20-20370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUREL ERMURAKI and ANASTASIIA ERMURAKI
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, USCIS Director, TONY L. BRYSON, USCIS District Director, KEVIN MCALEENAN, DHS Secretary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
