Cases 21 - 30 of 409
ROBINSON v. CHESTER USPS POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2022cv03397
Plaintiff:
CORI ROBINSON
Defendant:
CHESTER USPS, ANN D BRYANT and CHESTER USPS POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
David CrespoIn re: David Crespo
as 22-11578
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID ANTHONY CRESPO
Respondent:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT and WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Mikeal Stine v. USDC-AZT
as 22-70015
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MIKEAL GLENN STINE, JEAN LOUIS, Pharmacist, USP/Arizona and K. GARCIA, Trust Fund Supervisor, USP/Tucson, Arizona
Petitioner:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Calvin James v. FCC COLEMAN- USP I, et al
as 21-14457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN- USP I and COLEMAN 1 KITCHENS
Calvin James v. Coleman USP-1 Maintenance, et al
as 21-14459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
COLEMAN USP-1 MAINTENANCE and CITY OF WILDWOOD
William Milliron, Sr. v. K. Brown
as 21-7735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM B. MILLIRON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. K. BROWN, MR. G. HARRIS, Challenge Program DTS, DR. GILLESPIE, Psychology Service Supervisor and others
Calvin James v. USA, et al
as 21-14369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CLC Coleman Supervisory Attorney and FCC COLEMAN- USP I, Tort Claims Personnel
Williams v. Warden of USP
as 21-11214
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marshall Dewayne Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden of USP, Coleman FCI
Jeffrey Holland v. Warden Canaan USP
as 21-3240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY HOLLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN CANAAN USP
Rodney Nelson v. Rodney Ward, et al
as 21-6154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY D. NELSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY WARD, Unit Manager, SAMUEL J. PATRICK, Case Manager, JANE DOE, C-4 Unit Counselor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
