Cases 41 - 50 of 144
Amerson v. USP Pollock
as 6:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Steven Amerson
Defendant:
USP Pollock, Warden, USP McCreary and SHU Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marrero v. Warden, USP McCreary et al
as 6:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Edwin Marrero
Defendant:
Warden, USP McCreary and John and Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pleasant v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Raheem Pleasant
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden of USP-Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abdeljaber v. USP Lewisburg
as 5:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ali Odeh Abdeljaber
Defendant:
USP Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr, Warden Civile, Director of NCR FBOP Barb Von Blanckness and others
Defendant:
USP McCreary, AI Unit Manager Clark, Counselor Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Rivera-Ruperto v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wendell Rivera-Ruperto
Defendant:
USP McCreary, U.S. F.B.O.P. and Stappleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond v. Warden of USP McCreary et al
as 6:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Keith Drummond
Defendant:
Warden of USP McCreary, John and/or Jane Does and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lee v. USP McCreary
as 6:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee
Defendant:
USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres-Guardado v. Warden, USP Big Sandy
as 7:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Torres-Guardado
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McLaughlin v. USP McCreary
as 6:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Timothy McLaughlin
Defendant:
USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
