Cases 21 - 30 of 44
WESTINE v. USP-TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2017cv00279
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP-TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
JOHN G. WESTINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FORD V. WARDEN
as 2:2017cv00093
Petitioner:
KELVIN FORD
Respondent:
WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00435
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JEFF LAMPING, L. LARIVA and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00012
Defendant:
BROOKS, CHARLIE DANIELS, FCI/USP TERRE HAUTE and others
Plaintiff:
LOUSHAWN A. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00010
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, KIMBERLY LEMONS, D. MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CLARK v. WARDEN
as 2:2015cv00246
Petitioner:
GEORGE CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. WARDEN, U.S.P. Terre Haute
as 2:2015cv00053
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL EUGENE JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPENCER v. WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2015cv00036
Petitioner:
ADDONES SPENCER
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FIELDS v. USP TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2014cv00315
Petitioner:
SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS
Respondent:
WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CRADDOCK v. CARRAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00285
Defendant:
J. F. CARRAWAY, CEO/COMPLEX WARDEN and USP TERRE HAUTE
Plaintiff:
ORILLION CRADDOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
