Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
PATRICK v. USP MCCREARY
as 1:2019cv00790
Petitioner: JOHN PATRICK
Respondent: USP MCCREARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LLOYD v. USP LEE
as 1:2019cv00682
Petitioner: ANTWAN O'BRIAN LLOYD
Respondent: USP LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARNOCKY v. USP CANAAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00483
Defendant: USP CANAAN
Plaintiff: JOHN J. BARNOCKY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARNOCKY v. USP CANAAN
as 1:2019cv00355
Defendant: USP CANAAN
Plaintiff: JOHN J. BARNOCKY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMPTON v. USP LEWISBURG
as 1:2019cv00200
Defendant: USP LEWISBURG
Plaintiff: TRAE COMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chapman v. USPS/US Attorney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00132
Plaintiff: Tonya R. Chapman
Defendant: USPS/US Attorney
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
GOLDEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv00590
Petitioner: ODELL GENE GOLDEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HAZELTON USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI v. SLUSSER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff: SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI
Defendant: SCOTT T. SLUSSER, SEAN PERRIN, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff: PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant: ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. USP Terre Haute We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00359
Plaintiff: Charlie Wayne Bryant
Defendant: USP Terre Haute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?