Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stewart v. Kearns Unified Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Stewart
Defendant:
Kearns Unified Police Department and FNU Shaw
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rohwedder v. Sperry et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Plaintiff:
Billy L. Rohwedder
Defendant:
Unified Police Department and Warenski Sperry
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barney v. Unified Police Department Adult Detention Center
as 2:2020cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bryan Barney and Jeremy Bryan Barney Randall
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Defendant:
Unified Police Department Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Peatross et al
as 2:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jeorge Thomas
Defendant:
Jared Peatross, Unified Police Department and West Jordan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Unified Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00886
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Defendant:
Unified Police Department, Brian Loerke, Shawn Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Tyler v. Salt Lake County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00803
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Tyler
Defendant:
Salt Lake County Sheriff's Department, Tyler Albrecht, Frank Yengich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Russell et al
as 2:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Joseph
Defendant:
J. Russell, D. Olzak and Unified Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millan v. Unified Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Alexander Millan
Defendant:
Matthew Giles and Unified Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rohwedder v. Unified Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Billy L. Rohwedder
Defendant:
Unified Police Department, West Jordan Police Department and FNU Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
