Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1155
Petitioner:
Air Alliance Houston, California Communities Against Toxics, Clean Air Council and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and E. Scott Pruitt, Adminstrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Petitioner:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Intervenor For Respondent:
American Chemistry Council, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Goldstein v. Climate Action Network et al
as 5:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Leonid Goldstein
Defendant:
Climate Action Network , Ceres Inc , Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. FERC
as 16-1236
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club and Union of Concerned Scientists
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
PJM Industrial Customer Coalition, Maryland Public Service Commission, NRG Power Marketing, LLC and others
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA
as 15-1364
Not Yet Classified:
Catholic Climate Covenant, ; Catholic Rural Life; Evangelical Environmental Network; National Council of Churches USA; Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life; Church World Service; Union of Reform Judaism; Women of Reform Judaism; National Bapt, Don J. Easterbrook, Gordon J. Fulks and others
Amicus Curiae:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Loggers Association of Northern California, Boulder County, CO and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality and State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Mike Hunter
Natural Resources Defense Coun v. United States Food and Drug Ad
as 12-3607
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Center For Science In The Public Interest, Food Animal Concerns Trust and others
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Margaret Hamburg, in her official capacity as Commissioner, United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine and others
Natural Resources Defense Coun v. United States Food and Drug Ad
as 12-2106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Center For Science In The Public Interest, Food Animal Concerns Trust and others
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Margaret Hamburg, in her official capacity as Commissioner, United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine and others
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2011cv03562
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. , Center For Science In The Public Interest , Food Animal Concerns Trust and others
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Margaret Hamburg, Center for Veterinary Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
State of Texas, et al v. EPA
as 10-1041
Petitioner:
State of Texas, Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Union of Concerned Scientists
Competitive Enterprise Institu, et al v. EPA
as 10-1045
Petitioner:
Competitive Enterprise Institute, FreedomWorks Foundation and Science and Environmental Policy Project
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Union of Concerned Scientists
Ohio Coal Association v. EPA
as 10-1040
Petitioner:
Ohio Coal Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Union of Concerned Scientists
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
