Cases 1 - 10 of 370
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rhoads v. United Airlines Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jerrett Rhoads
Defendant:
United Airlines Inc and Corporations A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Konda v. United Airlines Inc.
as 23-4332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY KONDA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED AIRLINES INC., a Delaware corporation
Kim v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 5:2023cv06583
Plaintiff:
Jiyoung Kim
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
DexCom, Inc. et al v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10655
Plaintiff:
DexCom, Inc., CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. MC-1000283 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. MC-1000283
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., United Airlines, Inc., Does ONE through TEN and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
