Cases 41 - 50 of 471
Frank v. USA
as 3:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
Jimel Frank
Defendant:
USA and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ibrihim v. Director/Warden Shelby County Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv02221
Plaintiff:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Defendant:
Director/Warden Shelby County Corrections, Warden Federal Medical Center Butner, NC, Janika White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Mark Jordan
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORMAN v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MARCELLUS NORMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CARRIN v. STRONG et al
as 4:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
SANDRA GAIL CARRIN
Defendant:
ERICA STRONG, CRAIG COIL, SHAUNA MARIE SMILLIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Folk v. Howard et al
as 3:2021cv01986
Petitioner:
Omar Folk
Respondent:
Catricia Howard and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Antwoyn Spencer v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-3490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Antwoyn Terrell Spencer
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Warden J. Fikes, Captain Warlick and others
ABBOTT v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv02492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. ABBOTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, SHELLEY POWER, LORETTA OTIS-SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Harris v. USA, et al
as 21-2394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
BUTT v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Petitioner:
OMAR BUTT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN V. MOSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
