Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Faller v. Hendrix et al
as 4:2020cv01347
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Dewayne Hendrix and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
James S Faller, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noyola v. Stiles et al
as 2:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Emilio Noyola
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Stiles, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2019cv00043
Plaintiff:
Lavar Kinnell Ellis
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Dewayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lane v. Hendricks et al
as 2:2018cv00156
Defendant:
Hendricks, T Carter, Rosalez and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Brooke Boyles, Hendricks, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2012cv00774
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Best Buy, Big Lots Stores Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2012cv00094
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy C Outlaw, Johnson, Cuccio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peone v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
Everett T Peone
Defendant:
USA, United States Bureau of Prisons, Hipolito Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Aviant et al
as 2:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Aviant, United States Bureau of Prisons and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Forrest City Medical Center et al
as 2:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Henry A Williams
Defendant:
Forrest City Medical Center, United States Bureau of Prisons and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
