Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Whitfield v. United States of America et al
as 2:2008cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jahmal Whitfield
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons and Federal Correction Institution Gilmer
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Davis v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys
as 5:2008cv00128
Plaintiff:
Gregory Davis
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cochran v. DeBoo et al
as 3:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Larry Cochran
Defendant:
Kuma J. DeBoo and United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cuevas v. United States Department of Justice/Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2007cv00164
Petitioner:
Silvestre B. Cuevas
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice/Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ezebuihe v. United States Department of Justice/Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2007cv00075
Plaintiff:
Princewill Ezebuihe
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice/Federal Bureau of Prisons, Christi Cutright, Anthony Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv00063
Plaintiff:
Gregory Davis
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department of Justice, United States Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Murphy v. FCI Gilmer et al
as 2:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
Troy Murphy
Defendant:
FCI Gilmer, United States Department of Justice/Federal Bureau of Prisons and Unknown Mail Room Employees of FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
