Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Howell v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1374
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In Re: Fishman
as 24-1047
Petitioner:
DEBORAH FISHMAN
Respondent:
MASSACHUSETTS PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT, HONORABLE JUDGE CHRISTINE ANTHONY, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES and others
Howell v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv13156
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Department of Justice, IRS, FCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
In Re: Armenteros-Chervoni
as 23-8040
Respondent:
JORGE LUIS ARMENTEROS-CHERVONI
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
US v. Berrios-Cruz
as 23-1708
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM BERRIOS-CRUZ
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO
Duarte v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2023cv11933
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
United States District Court, Clerk Manager, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity, GE BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
