Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Aponte v. United States District Court District of Oregon
as 3:2023cv00947
Petitioner:
Richard Ramon Aponte
Respondent:
United States District Court District of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walden v. United States District Court District of Oregon
as 3:2021cv01344
Plaintiff:
April S. Walden
Defendant:
United States District Court District of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 3:2017cv01183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00158
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01767
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00623
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hendrix v. Kitzhaber et al
as 3:2013cv00149
Defendant:
Beth Heckert, Robert Herman, Mark Huddleston and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Terry C. Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albertson v. District of Columbia, United States et al
as 1:2012cv01096
Defendant:
Ann Aiken, Leo Henry Albertson, Jr., Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Lake County and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Henry Albertson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Zahir v. United States District Court
as 1:2007cv06274
Petitioner:
Abdul Qasim Ray Zahir
Respondent:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
