Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Todd Horob v. Chad Wright, et al
as 12-35779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD KENNETH HOROB
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAD WRIGHT, NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
Horob v. Wright et al
as 1:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
Todd Kenneth Horob
Defendant:
Chad Wright, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and United States District Court for the District of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Demuary v. United States District Court f, et al
as 12-35498
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN BAPTIST DEMUARY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA and UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
Demuary v. United States District Court for the District of Montana et al
as 2:2012cv00026
Respondent:
United States District Court for the District of Montana and United States Probation Office for the District of Montana
Petitioner:
John Baptist Demuary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raskiewicz v. United States District Court for the District of Montana
as 9:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Raskiewicz
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. United States Congress et al
as 9:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
James L. Larson
Defendant:
United States Congress and United States District Court for the District of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brothers v. United States District Court for the District of Montana
as 1:2008cv00051
Petitioner:
Amanda Jean Brothers
Respondent:
United States District Court for the District of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ANDERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv01189
Plaintiff:
GERALD DUANE ANDERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.