Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 74
WildEarth Guardians et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2024cv00557
Plaintiff: WildEarth Guardians, Western Watersheds Project and Caldera Action
Defendant: United States Forest Service, United States Fish & Wildlife Service, Randy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Higgins, et al.
as 24-1500
Plaintiff: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant: JEANNE HIGGINS, Idaho Panhandle National Forest Supervisor, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior
Helena Hunters and Anglers Association, et al. v. Moore, et al.
as 23-4120
Plaintiff / Appellant: HELENA HUNTERS AND ANGLERS ASSOCIATION, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee: RANDY MOORE, in his official capacity as Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3627
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Baker v. Teton County Circuit Court Clerk of Court et al
as 1:2022cv00241
Defendant: Teton County Circuit Court Clerk of Court, Teton County Circuit Court Judge, Fremont County Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff: Monte Lee Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
County of Ventura v. United States Forest Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02802
Plaintiff: County of Ventura
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Karina Medina, Tom Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv07171
Plaintiff: Center For Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Desert Survivors and others
Defendant: Deputy Director Nada Wolff Culver, United States Bureau of Land Management, State Director Karen Mouritsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Northern New Mexico Stockman's, et al v. United States Fish, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2019
Intervenor / Appellee: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and GREG SHEEHAN, Principal Deputy Director & Acting Director of the United States Fish & Wildlife Service, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: OTERO COUNTY CATTLEMAN'S ASSOCIATION and NORTHERN NEW MEXICO STOCKMAN'S ASSOCIATION
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Marten et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2021cv00005
Defendant: United States Forest Service, United States Fish & Wildlife Service and Leanne Marten
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?