Cases 1 - 10 of 99,492
Michel, Jeffrey v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MICHEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brooks-Davis v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Avery Brooks-Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ladd v. USA
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner:
Brad R. Ladd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Postell v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
Jarad Paul Postell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Briones v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Cristina Kaye Briones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Graham v. USA
as 3:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
Erin F. Graham, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown Parties, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Caraffa #350727 v. Noel et al
as 4:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
D Noel, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parker v. United States of America, The
as 3:2024cv00481
Petitioner:
Randall Parker
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
