Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CenturyLink Communications, LLC et al v. Level 3 Communications, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00988
Plaintiff: CenturyLink Communications LLC , Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC , Central Telephone Company and others
Defendant: Level 3 Communications LLC , Wiltel Communications LLC and Global Crossing Telecommunications Inc
CenturyLink Communications, LLC et al v. Level 3 Communications, LLC et al
as CO/1:16-cv-00003
Plaintiff: CenturyLink Communications, LLC , Carolina Telephone And Telegraph Company LLC , Central Telephone Company and others
Defendant: Level 3 Communications, LLC , WilTel Communications, LLC and Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.
CenturyLink Communications, LLC et al v. Level 3 Communications, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00003
Plaintiff: CenturyLink Communications, LLC , Carolina Telephone And Telegraph Company LLC , Central Telephone Company and others
Defendant: Level 3 Communications, LLC , WilTel Communications, LLC and Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0203
Sprint Communications Company LP v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company Incorporated et al
as 3:2014cv04420
Plaintiff: Sprint Communications Company LP
Defendant: Indiana Bell Telephone Company Incorporated , United Telephone Company of Indiana Inc , Clay County Rural Telephone Cooperative Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 206
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. v. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY INCORPORATED et al
as INS/1:14-cv-01006
Plaintiff: SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
Defendant: INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY INCORPORATED , UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF INDIANA, INC. , CLAY COUNTY RURAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. and others
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. v. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2014cv01006
Defendant: CLAY COUNTY RURAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC., HANCOCK RURAL TELEPHONE CORPORATION, INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff: SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Central Telephone Co of VA v. Sprint Communications Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1322
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, a Virginia Corporation, UNITED TELEPHONE SOUTHEAST, LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company, EMBARQ FLORIDA, INC., a Florida Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant: SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, INC., a Virginia Corporation and SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership
Central Telephone Company of Virginia et al v. Sprint Communications Company of Virginia, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00720
Plaintiff: Central Telephone Company of Virginia, United Telephone Southeast, LLC, Embarq Florida, Inc. and others
Defendant: Sprint Communications Company of Virginia, Inc. and Sprint Communications Company LP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332 Telecommuncations Act of 1996
Type: Contract Plaintiff
COMCAST PHONE OF CENTRAL INDIANA, LLC v. THE INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv01645
Plaintiff: COMCAST PHONE OF CENTRAL INDIANA, LLC
Defendant: THE INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, DAVID LOTT HARDY, LARRY S. LANDIS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Core Communications, Inc. v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1365
Petitioner: Core Communications, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner: EarthLink, Inc., O1 Communications, Inc., Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Respondent: AT&T Inc., Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, Central Telephone Company and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: Arizona Corporation Commission

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?