Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 223
Uncle Ronnie's Music Company, Inc. et al v. Tripolar, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00594
Plaintiff: Uncle Ronnie's Music Company, Inc., Purple Rabbit Music, Universal Polygram International Publishing, Inc. and others
Defendant: Tripolar, LLC doing business as W.T. Shorty's Grill, Joseph S. Conway, Lindsey S. Cardiff and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Universal Polygram International Publishing, Inc. et al v. SEC Properties, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff: Universal Polygram International Publishing, Inc., W Chappell Music Corp. doing business as WC Music Corp., Flying Rabbi and others
Defendant: SEC Properties, LLC, Dustin D. Sallee and John A. Colwell
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Concord Music Group, Inc. et al v. Anthropic PBC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01092
Plaintiff: Concord Music Group, Inc., Capitol CMG, Inc. doing business as Ariose Music doing business as Capitol CMG Genesis doing business as Capitol CMG Paragon doing business as Greg Nelson Music doing business as Jubilee Communications, Inc. doing business as Meadowgreen Music Compan, Universal Music Corp. doing business as Almo Music Corp. doing business as Criterion Music Corp. doing business as Granite Music Corp. doing business as Irving Music, Inc. doing business as Michael H. Goldsen, Inc. doing business as Universal - Geffe and others
Defendant: Anthropic PBC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Universal Polygram International Publishing Inc et al v. Metreaux Ops L L C et al
as 6:2023cv00201
Plaintiff: Universal Polygram International Publishing Inc and W Chappell Music Corp doing business as W C Music Corp
Defendant: Metreaux Ops, LLC, Timothy Metcalf, Greg Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc. et al v. Subterranean Limited Part. et al
as 1:2022cv04453
Plaintiff: Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Unfiltered Music, Center City Music and others
Defendant: Subterranean Limited Part., Edward R. Berry, Marty Vanderkarr and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc. et al v. Breakaway, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11347
Plaintiff: Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Maraville Music Corp. and Music Sales Corporation
Defendant: Breakaway, Inc. and Joseph P. Crowley
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 22-1451
Plaintiff / Appellee: SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, ARISTA MUSIC, ARISTA RECORDS, LLC and others
Plaintiff: NONESUCH RECORDS INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and COXCOM, LLC
Royce Int'l Broadcasting Corp., et al v. USDC-CARIV
as 21-71129
Petitioner: EDWARD R STOLZ, Esquire, PLAYA DEL SOL BROADCASTERS, SILVER STATE BROADCASTING, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court: NICE HAIR PUBLISHING, UH OH ENTERTAINMENT, PARTY ROCK MUSIC and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
WB Music Corp., et al v. Royce Intl. Broadcasting Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-55264
Plaintiff / Appellee: HI MOM I DIT IT, EMI APRIL MUSIC INC., DIVINE MILL MUSIC and others
Defendant / Appellant: GOLDEN STATE BROADCASTING, ROYCE INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING CORPORATION, PLAYA DEL SOL BROADCASTERS and others
Receiver: W. LAWRENCE PATRICK
WB Music Corp., et al v. Royce International Broadcasti, et al
as 21-55138
Plaintiff / Appellee: HI MOM I DIT IT, EMI APRIL MUSIC INC., DIVINE MILL MUSIC and others
Defendant / Appellant: GOLDEN STATE BROADCASTING, ROYCE INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING CORPORATION, PLAYA DEL SOL BROADCASTERS and others
Receiver: W. LAWRENCE PATRICK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?